(AI4SciSci Workshop 2026) (Artificial Intelligence for Science of Science)
Over the past decade, the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed significant advancements across various domains, such as natural language processing and computer vision, which have further accelerated discoveries, innovations, and breakthroughs in many interdisciplinary fields — including Science of Science, which relies on big data to uncover reproducible patterns governing the evolution of research topics, collaboration networks, knowledge diffusion, and the systemic factors that drive scientific progress. Today, Science of Science is incorporating AI techniques into the analysis of big data, yielding deep and compelling insights into both longstanding and emerging problems in the field. Building on the success of the first and second AI4SciSci workshops, held in conjunction with ICDM’23 and JCDL’25, respectively, we propose the Third International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for the Science of Science (AI4SciSci) to further engage the AI and Science of Science communities in promoting research and discussion on frontier topics in this area.
We welcome papers on topics of interest that include, but are not limited to, the following.
One unique feature of our workshop is that we will accept both original and published submissions. Authors of published works will need to submit an extended abstract (up to 2 pages) that explicitly cites the published work. In addition to summarizing the published work, the extended abstracts may also contain incremental updates or new results of the published work.
Ai4SciSci adopts the same double-blind review policy as JCDL. Submissions must not include any information that could identify the authors, such as names, institutional affiliations, acknowledgments, or references to prior work written in the first person. Authors should refer to their own prior work in the third person (e.g., “Prior work by Smith et al. (2020)” rather than “In our previous work…”). If authors share supplementary materials (e.g., code, data, models), these must be anonymized to avoid revealing author identities. Authors are encouraged to use anonymous hosting platforms such as anonymous.4open.science.
All submissions must be written in English, following the CEUR workshop proceedings style.
Paper submission link: EasyChair
** References and appendices are not counted towards the page limits.
All accepted papers that report original work will be published at the CEUR proceedings.
— Schedule —
| CDT (UTC−5) | EDT (New York) | Beijing (UTC+8) | Duration (minutes) | Type | PaperID.Title | Presenter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9:00 AM | 10:00 AM | 10:00 PM | 15 | Opening | Opening remarks | Dr. Jian Wu |
| 9:15 AM | 10:15 AM | 10:15 PM | 75 | Keynote |
Science of Human–AI Coevolution
|
Dr. Yifan Qian |
| 10:30 AM | 11:30 AM | 11:30 PM | 30 | Break | Break | |
| 11:00 AM | 12:00 PM | 12:00 AM (+1 day) | 20 | Invited |
Journal AI policies and the disclosure gap in AI-assisted academic writing
|
Dr. Yi Bu |
| 11:20 AM | 12:20 PM | 12:20 AM (+1 day) | 25 | Long |
14. Foundation over Frontier: The Age of Science Cited by Patents after the Diffusion of Generative
AI
|
Saif Ali Alghamdi |
| 11:45 AM | 12:45 PM | 12:45 AM (+1 day) | 25 | Long |
19. Structure-Aware IMRaD Classification with Pretrained Language Models and Document-Layout Priors
|
Dongin Nam |
| 12:10 PM | 1:10 PM | 1:10 AM (+1 day) | 25 | Short |
21. Translational Sleepers in Computational Social Science: Understanding Academia-to-Industry
Translation
|
Jawwad Shadman Siddique |
| 12:35 PM | 1:35 PM | 1:35 AM (+1 day) | 55 | Break | Break | |
| 1:30 PM | 2:30 PM | 2:30 AM (+1 day) | 25 | Long |
22. FutureLens: Longitudinal Topic Patterns in Scholarly Text and Future-Work References
|
Ibrahim Al Azher |
| 1:55 PM | 2:55 PM | 2:55 AM (+1 day) | 25 | Long |
18. Extracting Quantum Hardware Benchmark Claims: A Document-Grounded Audit of Cross-Paper
Comparability
|
Harish Varma Siravuri |
| 2:20 PM | 3:20 PM | 3:20 AM (+1 day) | 25 | Long |
23. Cross-Paper Result Comparability: A Dataset, Protocol-Partitioned Leaderboards, and a Census
|
Harish Varma Siravuri |
| 2:45 PM | 3:45 PM | 3:45 AM (+1 day) | 45 | Break | Break | |
| 3:30 PM | 4:30 PM | 4:30 AM (+1 day) | 60 | Panel | Panel discussion (topic TBD) | Dr. Jian Wu (facilitator) |
| 4:30 PM | 5:30 PM | 5:30 AM (+1 day) | 15 | Closing | Closing note | Dr. Jian Wu |
CDT is UTC−5; EDT (New York) is UTC−4. Beijing times marked (+1 day) are on the following calendar day.
Machines have always been integral to scientific discovery, extending human reach and augmenting human ingenuity. Yet these machines largely remained instruments: humans formulated the questions, interpreted the evidence, evaluated explanations, and organized the collective enterprise of science. Large language models and AI agents are beginning to alter this division of cognitive labor, as machines move from passive instruments toward increasingly active epistemic participants. At the same time, our understanding of science remains overwhelmingly a story about humans. The Science of Science asks how science advances. AI for Science asks what machines can discover. But what happens to science—and to scientists—when machines become part of the system that advances it?
In this talk I will draw on our recent work on research funding and university innovation to illustrate the emerging dynamics of human–AI coevolution in science and innovation. In the funding pipeline, we study 5,700 confidential proposal submissions and 131,000 publicly released awards from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2021–2025. We find that LLM use has risen sharply since 2023; proposals with higher LLM involvement closely resemble recently funded work at both agencies and are more likely to be funded and to yield early-stage publications at NIH but not at NSF, providing large-scale evidence that the rise of LLMs is reshaping how scientific ideas are positioned, selected, and translated into publicly funded research. In university innovation, using data that combines 15 universities' confidential faculty rosters, invention disclosures, patents, and licenses, we develop AI models to predict commercialization potential. These models reveal a large reservoir of faculty with high but unrealized innovation potential, and a randomized field experiment, partnering with the Technology Transfer Office at a major research university, shows that directing low-cost outreach to these faculty leads them to file more new invention disclosures than controls. Beyond documenting how AI is changing the way ideas get written, selected, and translated, this line of work offers measures and interventions with direct policy implications for funders, universities, and the design of human–AI partnerships..
(Co-Chair)
Associate Professor
The Pennsylvania State University, USA
smr48@psu.edu